Practical digital skills

Evaluate studies found with Consensus

Use scholarly discovery to find studies, then examine their methods and limits.

Step-by-step guideUpdated
Follow the method ↓
Two people examine a computer screen together

The answer in 30 seconds

A research result can identify a promising study without establishing a general conclusion. Different populations, measurements and study designs may answer different questions.

Bound the research question, seek contrary findings and read beyond the abstract. Keep the references and the reasons for including each study.

Examples to adapt

Two studies reach different conclusions

Compare populations, outcomes and methods before treating them as direct contradictions.

Only the abstract is accessible

State that limit and avoid claiming to have checked the full method.

Follow the method

  1. 1
    Define the concepts

    List the main concepts and synonyms. Specify the population, context or period needed so unlike studies are not silently mixed.

  2. 2
    Locate publications

    Read titles, dates and publication types. Search explicitly for contradictory results and relevant reviews.

  3. 3
    Examine methods

    Check sample size, measures, study design and limitations. Distinguish an observed association from a demonstrated causal effect.

  4. 4
    Keep an evidence record

    Record the identifier, version consulted and reason for inclusion. Mark studies whose full text you could not access.

A checklist to keep

Use these checks to record what you found. The grid supports a decision; it does not make one for you.

Evaluate studies found with Consensus: checklist
CheckWhat to examineAction
QuestionConcepts and populationDefine the scope
StudyType, date and identifierRecord the publication
MethodSample, measurement and limitsRead beyond the abstract
SelectionIncluded and excluded evidenceDocument the criteria

Download the CSV checklist

Free, no sign-up. UTF-8 text with semicolon-separated columns.

What to check

Do not select only favourable results.

Cite publications actually examined.

Keep discovery and evidence appraisal separate.

Common questions

Can I cite the tool’s result alone?

Use the publications you actually examined as evidence.

How can I reduce selection bias?

Search for contrary findings and document inclusion criteria before choosing a conclusion.

Sources and documentation

Documentation consulted on . Examples are illustrative; interfaces and results may change.

Reference record for this resource

Identify the publisher, official destination and practical checks before using the service.

Read the Consensus record →

Continue exploring

All English guides →