From a question to a usable result

Build a verifiable bibliography

Connect the question, document versions, identifiers and inclusion criteria without confusing discovery with reading.

Published Illustrative examples

Prepare the task

A useful bibliography lets a reader locate each work and understand its relevance. It should also identify documents you could not examine.

  • Question and main concepts
  • Period, language or population criteria
  • Tracking table without invented references

Follow the method

  1. 1
    Define scope

    Record concepts, synonyms and inclusion criteria before selecting works. Search for findings contrary to your hypothesis as well.

  2. 2
    Compare references

    Record title, authors, date, identifier and version. A record, preprint and published article can represent different states.

  3. 3
    Connect reading and citation

    State what part was consulted and which point it supports. Mark inaccessible text instead of claiming its method was checked.

An example to adapt

Two records look identical but the files differ: compare dates and versions before removing a supposed duplicate.

Choose the resource for the missing evidence

The directory records identify publishers and link to their official services. Choose by task; inclusion does not guarantee an outcome.

Task, resource and verification
TaskResourceCheck
Compare a reference and DOICrossrefCheck authors, title and associated object.
Explore open journalsDirectory of Open Access JournalsCheck the particular journal and article.
Find a deposited versionHALRead the record and identify the available version.

Keep a useful record

Use these fields in your own notes. This page does not collect your documents or personal details.

  • Reference and identifier
  • Version and access actually consulted
  • Inclusion or exclusion reason
  • Relevant finding and limits
Download the task worksheet

UTF-8 CSV, semicolon-separated columns. No sign-up.

Before drawing a conclusion

A synthesis based only on abstracts must disclose that limit; some decisions need a fuller examination.

Common questions

Does a DOI prove study quality?

It helps identify and locate an object; methods and content still need appraisal.

Should I retain excluded works?

A list with reasons makes the selection easier to assess.